|
|
Post by Anarchy on Dec 3, 2006 20:55:56 GMT
On July the first two-thousand and seven Smoking in public bars and resturants will be banned. Being a smoker myself, I may have a biased opinion, but then so will everyone else, but furthermore the government chose NOT to exclude private bars and clubs in the blanket ban. I know this one is probably for the debates boards, but I feel people should say what they like. What are your views?
|
|
|
|
Post by Luco El Loco on Dec 7, 2006 19:01:17 GMT
My lungs will be happy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anarchy on Dec 11, 2006 13:11:29 GMT
sure, then you will have sh*t loads of grouchy smoke depraved people snapping at you because they had no nicotine. another problem, with that is that more people will be smoking at home, therefore endanfering children. Everyone will just get hooked on heroin =P
|
|
|
|
Post by Luco El Loco on Dec 11, 2006 18:39:44 GMT
Well it's not my fault some people don't deserve to have children. It's up to them if they endanger their kids, not anyone else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anarchy on Dec 12, 2006 15:01:40 GMT
True. But it is taking it a bit too far. Like pubs that dont serve food should be exempt, private bars and clubs are under the PUBLIC ban. it makes no sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Luco El Loco on Dec 13, 2006 16:14:07 GMT
How so? Why not just have smoking clubs?  Free choice for all! Then us alcoholics can drink without polluting our lungs as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Anarchy on Dec 16, 2006 15:07:41 GMT
hear hear!
like a shisha house for cigarettes!
|
|
|
|
Post by Luco El Loco on Dec 17, 2006 13:23:46 GMT
Yeah, why not?
|
|
Kahuna
Frequent User
Posts: 25
|
Post by Kahuna on Dec 17, 2006 18:27:05 GMT
A smokeless bar? That just doesn’t sound right put together in the same sentence! LOL!
|
|
|
|
Post by Luco El Loco on Dec 17, 2006 20:17:50 GMT
They did fine before tobacco was discovered.  |
|
|
|
Post by Anarchy on Dec 19, 2006 17:30:58 GMT
yes, but you guys(non-smokers) did fine, around us when we were smoking until you discovered passive smoking is fatal?  |
|
|
|
Post by Luco El Loco on Dec 27, 2006 21:20:23 GMT
That's not strictly true now. There are documents where people had commented on the unpleasantness for many years before. Then once they knew it was physically harmful, and not just stinky etc, they understandably wanted to protect themselves.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anarchy on Dec 29, 2006 16:26:17 GMT
blah blah, lol. let us smoke and get p*ssed in the same environment would ya!
|
|
|
|
Post by Luco El Loco on Dec 31, 2006 12:46:53 GMT
Sure, so long as it's not the same bar as me. |
|
|
|
Post by Anarchy on Jan 4, 2007 17:07:04 GMT
alroight then. we'll just have to nip outside for a cancer stick then- wont we!
New topic!
In October I wont even be old enough to buy cigarettes its a f**king liberty. Its simple enough everyone who was legally old enough to buy cigarettes before the new law takes effect, should still be able to, and anyone who turns 16 afterwards- tough luck! the government really hates us smelling-of-ashtray guys!
|
|
